SF Tennis Freak

From Rafa’s Facebook page

If you thought the Nadal-Djokovic semifinal “final” at this year’s French Open was unfortunate, just wait. It’s about to get even better at Wimbledon!

Rafa, the current world no. 5, was maintained at that position and given the #5 seed for this year’s tournament. It’s a situation that the Wimbledon Seeding Committee could have changed, but didn’t. Depending on his draw, Rafa could face Novak, Roger Federer, or Andy Murray in the quarterfinals. How could the Committee let this happen?

On its face, this might seem reasonable for a player who missed seven months due to injury. That’s a long time away from the tour, and a lot of ranking points lost. At this time last year, Rafa was No. 2. He came back in January as No. 5. He moved to No. 4 for the French, thankfully, which only left us with a semifinal fiasco, but couldn’t gain any new points with a title defense.

David Ferrer, on the other hand, gained a boatload of points for his finalist showing. So with Rafa simply maintaining his position, David leapfrogged ahead.  Thus we have Ferrer at No. 4 and Rafa at No. 5.

The situation of having the #5 seed playing a tough match in the quarters would be fine (and even expected) if we were talking about other players like Jo-Wilfried Tsonga or Tomas Berdych. Ferrer himself suffered that burden on many a Grand Slam occasion.  But we’re not talking about any other player, we’re talking about Rafael Nadal: a player who’s won 12 Grand Slam titles, including two at the All England Club.

For anyone who thinks that those credentials don’t warrant an adjustment in seeding for Rafa, consider this. Rafa has played 9 events in 2013 since coming back from injury, and has made the finals of all 9 events entered. He’s won 7 titles from those finals, and is the first of the top guys to qualify for the Barclays ATP World Tour Finals.

Again I ask: how could the Seeding Committee let this happen?

Though I want desperately to point the finger of shame at live persons, the real culprit is the formula by which the committee makes adjustments to the tournament seeds. Fellow writer Ben Rothenberg sent this explanatory tweet:

Interestingly, #Wimbledon formula puts Ferrer ahead of Nadal because of his ‘s-Hertogenbosch 2012 title, for which he beat 0 top 50 players.

— Ben Rothenberg (@BenRothenberg) June 19, 2013

Changes to tournament seeds used to be made subjectively by the committee, but no longer. The formula sets the standard, and it’s unfortunate on many levels. It’s unfortunate for Rafa because he will likely need to play the equivalent of 3 finals in order to win a third Wimbledon title; much like he played the equivalent of 2 finals at this year’s French Open.

It’s also unfortunate for the unlucky top-seed guys who must play Rafa a round or two earlier than expected or warranted. Can you imagine the look on Novak, Roger, or Andy’s face when they realize they might have to play Rafa in the quarters? “Dread” would likely be an understatement.

Mostly, this situation is unfortunate for the fans. The French Open semifinal between Rafa and Novak was tense, brilliant, scintillating, and dramatic to the last game. The final between Rafa and David Ferrer was anticlimactic at best, and a foregone conclusion. The bad weather and flare-wielding protesters merely added to the miserable day for both the ticketed fans and the TV audience.

Wimbledon is the grandest Slam of them all. It’s the tournament of which dreams are made for both players and fans, and has been the home to some of the most memorable finals ever played. It deserves better, and its’ fans deserve better.

Jon Wertheim of SI.com wrote a book on the 2008 final between Rafa and Roger titled Strokes of Genius: Federer, Nadal, and the Greatest Match Ever Played. Many others, writers and tennis legends alike, also believe that to be one of the greatest matches ever played.  With Rafa seeded #5, that same match could be a quarterfinal. And that just feels wrong.

This final release from this year’s Player Interview series features Adrian Chang: a fellow GLTF’er and resident Canuck. I initially grabbed Adrian for a bag check but realized quickly that he would also be a great choice for a longer sit-down.

I wish could re-shoot this video. From my first to my final shoot, I got better at exploring my subjects, and more comfortable with letting the interviews go off the beaten path. Now that I’m privy to Adrian’s inner workings on Facebook, I see that there’s a lot to explore!

Alas, there are no “do-overs”; but I’m sure I’ll be able to coax him into a video update later this year.

Until then, I hope you enjoy my chat with Adrian.

Date: 6/15/2013

Location: San Francisco State

Conditions: Outdoors, cold, misty

Doubles or Singles Played: Doubles

Match Result: 6-3 7-5 Loss

Season Record: 2-5

Match Notes: We played our last match of the season in what most of us felt was also some of the worst weather of the season. It was cold, gray, and misty: a typical San Francisco summer day. Fortunately there was little wind, so conditions were plausible for decent play.

I’d hoped to end the season on a winning high note, but it didn’t work out that way. There was much to learn from this match for the off-season, positive takeaways of good play as well as a handful of points that will replay in my mind, (begging for a different outcome that will never happen.)

Qui, one of our co-captains, was my partner for this match. We hadn’t played together this season, but I’ve known Qui long enough to know how solid he is. He’s a lefty with solid technique and timing on his strokes. He’s got an excellent lob and great hands at the net. He’s also one of the best competitors I’ve seen.

I knew we’d be fine, and we were for the most part. We played well, and fought hard when our back was up against it.  But we ultimately lost the match because we didn’t win the points that mattered.

For my part, I played well when nothing was on the line. (Not counting my one Sharapova service game of 3 double faults and an unforced error). When I needed to come up with the goods on crucial game/break points, I played tentative tennis that really cost us.

The moment I won’t forget occurred at 5 games all, 30-all in the second set on Qui’s serve. We’d battled back from 3-5 and were in position to take the lead. I had a chance to end the point on one of two back-to-back overheads. I hit the first and almost missed the outside of the sideline. They didn’t call it out, but the call could easily have gone against us.

The guy closest to the first shot scrambled and sent up a high defensive lob. With the close call on the first overhead still in my head, I got tentative. Instead of letting the lob bounce for an easier shot, I took it out of the air and hit an overly safe shot that the “good” guy hit for a strong groundie to win the point.

Now facing break point, I had a chance to put away a volley winner on a service return. Instead of staying calm to hit the shot with a clear head, I thought “Don’t blow this one too” – and I sent the ball into the net.  After the break, our opponents went on to serve out the next game for the win. We were sent packing from a match that should have gone to a match tiebreak because I’d missed two huge opportunities with tentative ball-striking.

It sucked, but I’m not alone in this regard. The challenge of every sport, not just tennis, is to rise to the occasion by staying calm and relaxed so that there’s no tightness in the execution of your technique.

As Rafa said after his victory over Fabio Fognini at this year’s French Open, “If I can calm down I will play better; otherwise I can go back to Majorca and go fishing.” I’m not out fishing, but you get the point.

Now it’s time to share the positives. The first is that I played within myself didn’t overplay my forehand and/or serve. That’s a good thing for someone like me who often feels the pressure to go for big shots that I don’t need when the situation gets tense.

Another positive was my ability to shake off a horrendous call. I got hooked badly on a second serve that should have been an ace. My opponent looked at his partner, and said “I think it was out. What do you think?” The partner had turned away from us, but I later found out from our captain that he said it looked in to him. I looked at my opponent again and he said “I think I saw it wide.”

Okay. If you’re gonna make a bad call, at least do it with a semblance of conviction! Also, rule of thumb is that if you can’t agree with your partner then you concede the point…which he didn’t. I got steamed, and was ripe for a service break, but steadied the ship, I held serve to prove the point that you can’t beat me even if you cheat.

On another note, there were two moments that caught the attention of my inner “Roving Umpire”

The first occurred as I went to hit a second serve to the “bad call” opponent. After I started my motion, he ran to grab a ball at the side of the court. After putting it into his pocket, he set up to receive serve as though nothing happened. I said “First serve, right?” He started to protest but his partner agreed. A deliberately interrupted motion in the middle of a second serve clearly warranted a first serve.

The second was something I didn’t call, but could have. This same guy would toss the second ball from his pocket toward the back fence after making first serve. It never adversely affected a point, so I never called him out for what it was: a hindrance. It would be the same if the ball accidentally fell out of his pocket. First time a warning, second time the loss of a point, etc. Ask Andy Murray!

Finally, I had one last “Bonehead” moment at the end of the first set after missing a shot. I swiped the ground in anger with my racquet, and struck my leg with the butt of the grip. I hit the top of the shin muscle so hard that it bruised the surrounding area, also hurting the muscle to the point of pain when walking (after I cooled down). I gotta stop hurting myself …

Thoughts on the 2013 Season

Even though my final record was 2-5, I consider this season a success. My primary concern for the season was avoiding injuries; and I succeeded. The changes I made in terms of supplements and pre-/post-match gym work made a discernible difference. I’d still hurt for a day or so after matches, but was never incapacitated. The only injuries I had were self-inflicted, and completely avoidable. I guess that’s my work for next season.

It was also a success in terms of my mental game. In past years, I’ve struggled mightily to sustain a good positive mental state throughout the match.  This season, I felt calmer overall, and more in control. I still need to do a better job of controlling my mental game on big points, but that’s something that even the pros find difficult to manage. So I’m in good company.

The most important aspect of this season, as always, was to have a good time. And I did. I was a part of a great group of guys who had fun and supported one another. For me, that’s the point of the USTA season. That and the post-season party. J

See you next year.

I have a few Italian friends (i.e. Italian from Italy) and have always loved their expressiveness. So when I heard that there were USGO participants from Italy, I did my best to grab one of them for my player interview series.

Today’s player Interview features Paolo De Angelis from Rome.  Paolo made the decision to play in the USGO because it was voted the GLTA’s Best Large Tournament  for 2012. Timing is everything, however, and mine wasn’t the best since our interview came on the heels of a first-round loss in singles.  Even so, he was gracious in defeat and was glad he made the trip.

This translation is courtesy of Bing Translator, and I hope it’s correct: È stato un piacere incontrare e parlare con voi, Paolo. Grazie per il vostro tempo e la generosità. (It was a pleasure meeting and talking with you, Paolo. Thanks for your time and generosity.)

Note: The off-camera voice is a friend of Paolo’s who was on hand for any necessary translations. Paolo was worried about his English, but he was great. It’d be a very different story, however, if the interview shoe was on the other foot and I had to speak Italian…

This week’s question deals with strings, and what you can do if your string job isn’t quite working out the way you hoped it would.

Question: The poundage on my new stringing feels too tight. Is there a way that I can get my strings to loosen besides just hitting with them and suffering through the initial “ick” feeling?

Answer:  There isn’t a lot you can do to immediately loosen the tension on your strings. It’s not recommended, but you can try standing on your racquet’s string bed after laying it on a flat surface. Don’t bounce on it, just apply a few seconds of steady pressure with your foot! Many frames can withstand that pressure, and it might solve your problem. Unfortunately, the best answer is to hit with it and let the strings relax. If you’re very unhappy and the tension really becomes an issue with your game, work with your stringer to see what arrangements can be made for a restringing.

(SFTF Note: String modifications, or string mods as many call them, aren’t talked about a lot in tennis. However, more people than you’d ever suspect have tried various tricks to make an unhappy string job become a little more playable before “throwing in the towel” with a restringing. Unfortunately, the sad fact for most string mods is that they only offer temporary relief at best, and severely decrease string life.
Check out my experience with the black version of Wilson’s NXT strings, and the string modification via emery board I tried in order to compensate for my unhappiness with them.)

Thanks Marla!
Got a tennis question, but no one to ask?
Send it via email or tweet for “Ask Marla”, a (hopefully) weekly (or biweekly) question-and-answer with Marla Reid of San Francisco’s City Racquet Shop.

About Marla Reid

Marla Reid is a respected tennis pro/coach in the San Francisco Bay Area. She’s coached nationally-ranked teams and players at Occidental College, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, University of Kansas, and Florida Tech, and has over 15 years of experience at the NCAA Division I, II, and III levels. Marla has an M.A. in Exercise Physiology, and is a seasoned racquet stringer.

About City Racquet Shop

City Racquet Shop offers, superior products/services, outstanding customer service, and a community-oriented destination for tennis players to shop, hang out and talk about tennis.

City Racquet Shop online: www.cityracquetshop.com
City Racquet Shop on Yelp: http://www.yelp.com/biz/city-racquet-shop-san-francisco
City Racquet Shop on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cityracquetshop